Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Evans vs Richard Gabb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Evans vs Gabb analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Evans vs Richard Gabb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Evans 4 - 1 Gabb
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Evans has won 50.68% of points on their second serve, while Gabb has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Evans, in recent form, has won 50.2% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gabb has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.03% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Evans has saved 59.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gabb has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Evans has won 37.21% of matches played (W/L 16/ 27), with Gabb winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 164/ 98), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 47/ 55). Gabb has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 144/ 101), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 14/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Evans has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 27.78% of matches (W/L 5/ 13), where as Gabb has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Evans winning 4 times and Gabb being victorious 1 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Evans winning 8 and Gabb winning 3. The last match between Evans and Gabb was at the Great Britain F9, 07-09-2015, Quarterfinals, Hard with Daniel Evans getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Evans and Gabb have played a deciding set 1 times, with Evans winning 1 times and Gabb 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Evans winning 1, and Gabb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Evans has played against opponents with an average rank of 171.74 while Gabb has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Evans has won 35% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gabb has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Evans has converted 29.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gabb has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
61
Rank
21
High
34
Age
R
Plays
4
Total1
4
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
Ret.
Rank
410
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
60% (555-377)
Career Total W/L
55% (236-195)
32% (8-17)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,736,130
Career Prize Money
$710
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Daniel Evans vs Richard Gabb For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Evans VS Gabb
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Daniel Evans | Richard Gabb |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 8 | 3 |
| Games Won | 60 | 40 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 80% (4/5) | 20% (1/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
| 7-6(5) 6-2 | |||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-0 | |||||
| 6-3 6-2 | |||||
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Evans | Richard Gabb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 32% (8/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (26/38) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (302/342) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 107 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 87 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:10:36 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 197.72 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (1153/2041) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (837/1153) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (450/888) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 30% (49/164) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (725/2077) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 20% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 36% (8/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (4/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (3/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 54% (13/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 38% (13/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
19 of
22)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
13
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Henry Searle
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Dominic Stricker
53%
(
52 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
4
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
4
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Daniel Evans
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
14
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Adam Walton
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
12
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
1
93%
(
53 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
58 of
76)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
22 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
33 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Daniel Evans
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
101)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Daniel Evans
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
114)
20
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Daniel Evans
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Harold Mayot
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Richard Gabb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Luke Johnson
Player
Richard Gabb
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
52
Total Points Won
47
|
4-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gabb
Player
Johan Sebastien Tatlot
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Ortega-Olmedo
Player
Richard Gabb
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Sebastien Tatlot
Player
Richard Gabb
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
62)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richard Gabb
Player
Karl Friberg
43%
(
18 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
79%
(
19 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gabb
Player
Jules Okala
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
50%
(
43 of
86)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Richard Gabb
69%
(
75 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
112)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
112)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gabb
Player
Jordan Hasson
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Richard Gabb
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Igor Smilansky
Player
Richard Gabb
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
13
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
39 of
48)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
18 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Evans Vs Gabb Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Evans are available here and Gabb photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
